FITNESS-FOR-WORK REFERENCE · AUSTRALIAGENERAL INFORMATION ONLY — NOT LEGAL OR MEDICAL ADVICE
Home / Case database / Parks v WorkPac (U2025/1247, Batchfire mine)

Parks v WorkPac (U2025/1247, Batchfire mine)

Summary in review

Summary in review — this entry is being checked against the published decision text before the full summary ships. The citation and outcome are correct; treat the summary as provisional.

What happened

Coal mining worker at Batchfire mine used site self-test kits aligned to the superseded 25 ng/mL standard while formal testing used the 2019 standard's 15 ng/mL cut-off — a worker could pass his own test and fail the real one.

What it stands for

Site self-test kits aligned to the superseded 25 ng/mL standard while formal testing used 2019’s 15 ng/mL — a worker could pass his own kit and fail the program’s.

All 14 decisions

Report an error on this page