Pitts v AGC Industries [2013] FWCFB 9196
Process scrutinised
What happened
Urine screening and retest windows after non-negative results
What it stands for
Retest timeframes and how workers “come clean” matter — testing programs are judged as processes, not single results.
Primary source: Pitts v AGC Industries [2013] FWCFB 9196
Not legal advice. This page explains the law in general terms as at the “last verified” date shown. If you have been stood down or dismissed, or need to make a decision that depends on the law, speak to an employment lawyer — small differences in circumstances change outcomes, and the 21-day unfair dismissal deadline does not wait.